Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence happened in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some unsuspecting slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie websites that are streaming where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing down steam, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these specific machines. When dealing with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of cash. He’s a laborer and only works every now and then.’ Apparently, this will be one worker who keeps his equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally an extremely man that is quiet. He just moved in extremely calmly by having an axe and smashed all the machines. There were a few customers by them during the time plus they had been terrified,’ he included.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But prison overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of the two tales is really a bit more frightening, once the axe was wielded perhaps not during the slots, but at a member of the staff at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with some cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he don’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the crime said that two men, both using ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm regarding the night of the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate with all the tree-chopping tool.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of money,’ and the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive in the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight within the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal choice is linked to the theory that neighboring communities would be affected by casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos ought to be opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, happens to be one of the handful of prospects whom have suggested that most of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that might be positioned in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes down to the proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote about it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it would have on many Boston areas.
‘The Wynn proposal ended up being voted…on in only one community,’ Conley stated throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and social burdens but get none of the proposed benefits.’
In line with the state laws that produced the window of opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not to allow the projects to be built. However, casino developers are required to negotiate compensation, with arbitration required in the event that casinos and governments that are localn’t arrived at an answer by themselves.
Conley has proposed having a path that isn’t actually outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He might have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power on the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or myfreepokies.com Nay?
While Conley hasn’t specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposition, a Boston Globe survey unearthed that six associated with the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question had been in support of it, with just two coming down against it (with Conley and one other candidate not responding to the question). Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the whole town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% had been and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Regardless if voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii due to the fact future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of great britain’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his or her own hand caught in the activities book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired leading activities company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a gambling shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the large donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing users of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is one of this largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the large number of gambling outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the local roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘we understand there clearly was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling with betting shops and payday loan companies that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says a very important factor in public and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for the politician.
Spared on a Technicality
Nonetheless, fighting back the corner regarding the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna stated that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance aided by the guidelines and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is no further mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group implies that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party that are searching to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this type of hard stance against the spread of the industry in their neighborhood constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he really believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ reported Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is thought to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year their workplace had been accused of editing his Wikipedia page showing comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.